Blind evolution spin is planet wide.

No argument if we turn on the box.

With only blind coincidence to guide,

Life and humanity evolved from rocks.

Yes, TV thought police are on the ball,

And seize on any opportunity,

So there's no time for destiny to call.

Will their spin brutalize humanity,

If only molecules set our world view?

No, destiny will not be calling us,

With dog eat dog to settle what to do,

And zero time for the miraculous.

Evangelized by media and schools,

Our life equates to fancy molecules.

1/1/2017

Oh traveller, inquire, "Who are we?"

Check any evidence to let you find

Your definition of humanity.

Oh ask, if DNA has been designed,

Since evolution is the status quo.

Yes, analyse if life's just molecules,

To check on that design scenario.

Don't baulk, if anybody ridicules.

That's all they have to set reality,

And don't let any media distract.

Remember too, the call of destiny,

So don't be theoretical, but act.

Stay scientific with your evidence,

So only from the real experiments.

1/1/2018

If hunting destiny beyond the grave,

No, don't rely on any particle.

For gifts, we need a deity to save:

Transcendent God, always reliable.

Fortuitously we have sacred verse:

The opposite of evolution spin.

A God has set a mitigating curse,

Inside the Grand Designer origin.

Oh yes, to share a slice of destiny,

We want reliable, like cosmic laws,

And that's epitomized by gravity.

A deity can be The cosmic cause.

Our view is set beyond the particles.

And that's with deity and miracles.

2/1/2018

With rocks to men, is science qualified

To speak, if focused on the physical?

With that, proponents may be certified,

With their denial of the personal.

Yes, altering gene frequency is fine,

And species giving species is okay,

But not, always, denial of design,

Or their blind, physical scenario.

But that's accepted in society:

In sciences, our TV, in our schools

And governments. So no, big certainty:

Not certified, if we're just molecules.

But physical can never set our genes,

To implement its nano-sized machines.

3/1/2018

The evolutionists protest too much

If we stay skeptical that blind design

Should be the only scientific touch.

Oh yes, relax, don't be so asinine.

Since evolution's scientific fact,

And all the evidence so obvious,

Why do the fact police overreact,

And fling the accusations onto us,

When we point out a scientific fail?

Some objectivity should be in play,

But no, religious overviews prevail,

So only rocks can programme DNA.

When state religion sets reality,

Their spin has brutalized humanity.

3/1/2018

What sign sets judgement on humanity?

It's in the way we treat all children, right?

Yes, those protections of society.

It doesn't take a lot of deep insight

To see, corrupting them, or killing them,

Will make that judgement inevitable.

If teaching them the blind continuum,

With its denial of the personal,

A change of view becomes imperative,

To take society back from that brink.

So what can any contemplation give?

We really do possess, abilities to think.

So what about the cosmic masterpiece?

Obscured by education thought police.

3/1/2018

Inside the grand design scenario,

Its interplay sets testimonials.

The oxygen, given by plants, also,

Carbon dioxide by the animals,

Set up a beneficial atmosphere.

Can gravity set up a complement,

Or elements evolve a biosphere?

No way. But oh, the testament,,,

To awesome creativity out there.

Transcendence in a deity? Oh yes,

Oh yes, oh yes, omnipotent in care,

Giving his beneficial happiness.

Yes, oxygen and carbon testify.

A Grand Designer view can unify.

3/1/2018

Check evolution spin with trivia.

The trivia is speciation, right?

The spin is elemental media

To yield, in us, intelligent insight.

The trivia is always focused on,

To indicate, it's scientific fact.

But after that, any criterion,

Ideas come as elements react.

Is that reality, in any way,

When trivia, inside a biosphere

Tells us, the elements set DNA,

Not wanting deity to interfere?

No way. Eyes on eternal destiny:

The inspirational reality.

3/1/2018

Let's say we've found a scientific law,

That life originates from life, what then?

We could go with what fact police ignore,

And choose the Grand Designer origin.

Oh yes, life could exist beyond the veil,

To spark biology. Yes, God could act.

No panicking, let common sense prevail,

If life from life is scientific fact.

But thought police are always horrified

If we apply that simple inference,

To say a veiled God would be qualified.

Oh yes, it's logical,,, and common sense.

A scientific law, and logical

For life? What can we say? A miracle!

4/1/2018

The fact police tell us we must decide.

Since there's disease, calamity or wars,

A perfect God will not be qualified,

So everything is from a random cause,

Including consciousness. Decision time.

They have must-do tutorials for us,

On life and love, the prevalence of crime,

What God won't do, and the miraculous.

Ah yes, they also know what's optimal,

So no, design will never be involved,

If there are errors in the biological.

So yes, if it's diseased, then it evolved.

Decision time with that dichotomy?

We'll pass on that, in search of destiny.

4/1/2018

When we list every human character,

Like charity, aggressiveness, or greed,

Each one evolved from random media,

Since evolution spin meets any need.

Ah yes, the cake and icing paradigm,

With elements evolving into phones.

Accounting for intelligence, or crime,

The workaholic or the lazy bones.

Yes, all evolved from one parameter:

The law of gravity evolved our smile,

Our love, and any other character.

That's evolution spin doing, freestyle.

But our potential could be limitless,

So not from gravity or randomness.

4/1/2018

Machinery and logical, what's that?

The opposite of evolution spin.

The opposite of its blind caveat,

But right for the designer origin.

Yes, any life is all hi-tech inside,

So never any "simple" life in sight.

And that technology is system wide.

Yes, deity yields scientific light.

Then logical for us. Can we surmise

Intelligence from God's intelligence?

The evolutionists will spin their lies

To counteract that scientific sense.

But networking is our reality.

So we go with transcendent deity.

5/1/2018

The fact police set our curriculum,

Where DNA evolved from elements.

They postulate the blind continuum,

So all we see is from coincidence,

Set by their quantum instability.

As in, equivalent to outer space.

Then that evolved our creativity

And other benefits inside our race.

Yes, our curriculum is now defiled,

If fact police mandate the physical.

How sad. It has humanity beguiled,

With rocks to yield the biological.

All verifies corruption of our schools.

They never heed the scientific rules.

5/1/2018

With its convergence and inheritance,

Check out the cake and icing paradigm.

By just assuming their blind inference,

Can it account for honesty or crime,

Or any other human character?

Of course it can, it's scientific fact.

The rocks evolved our first progenitor,

As nothingness decided it should act,

To give that singularity, then us.

Why fact? Because of speciation, right?

Yes, trivia mandates blind randomness:

The mantra all the thought police recite.

If skeptics indicate it's not a fact,

The fact police of course, overreact.

5/1/2018

In all the contradictions of their spin,

The evolutionists stay resolute.

Reject the Grand Designer origin,

So only choose the evidence to suit.

What evidence? Errors or quirkiness.

A perfect God will set perfect design,

And never tolerate the wickedness.

So if life really is the grand design,

Life wouldn't be like we see it today.

They focus on the errors or the crime,

So no, all contradictions never sway,

Within their veiled religious paradigm.

Yes, wickedness is scientific fact,

And they know how a deity won't act.

5/1/2018

The ancient animals had DNA.

Hot topic in the origins debate.

Participants all ask, which interplay,

Is it a God or rocks we contemplate,

When hunting for the origin of life?

Plus, if applied to our humanity,

A deity or rocks for man and wife.

Also remember now, for clarity,

Describing life is not explaining it,

No matter what we know of DNA.

We're looking for a scientific fit,

Without religion coming into play.

We want a look at real reality.

And that means DNA technology.

5/1/2018

The jellyfish display their crystal bling,

Movement, the poise, as if ethereal.

We pause, as if the visual could sing,

The mesmerizing moves, the magical.

Would that be primitive in any way,

Like evolution thought police insist?

The crystal muscles wrought by DNA,

Ethereal,,, gliding,,, in liquid mist,,,

Magic in location. Primitive?

There's hi-tech signalling technology

By programming, so no, big negative.

But oh, big yes for creativity.

The origins debate is crystal clear.

It tells participants what we hold dear.

5/1/2018

For listening, vibrations in the air,

Will set off a mechanical device.

Precision in acoustical hardware:

An epitome for signalling precise.

Then multitudes of neurons firing

To interface electrical control,

To feed into the data processing.

And stereo to integrate the whole.

Put that inside the origins debate,

With life, to let imagination sail.

Then let the instruments initiate

Potential in the logarithmic scale.

If musical, let detailing enthral,

If waiting for our destiny to call.

6/1/2018

For destiny to call, there's moral law,

For layers of the deeply personal.

We have in life, its limits to explore,

Like limits for the biological

And cosmic law: Limits to gravity.

But not all things are possible out there,

And lots can damage our humanity.

So what's the law for charity and care?

Is it as simple as in sacred verse:

Acknowledge deity as source of good.

Besides a Son who made the Universe,

Believers can include a fatherhood.

With destiny, check out its moral laws.

For our humanity, its moral cause.

6/1/2018

Our knowledge of biology out there,

Is not explaining it, by any means.

But we do know life's DNA software

Incorporates its fancy subroutines

To orchestrate all functions in a cell.

We also know what sets up any code.

Yes, creativity, we know it well.

But evolutionists deny that road

That could lead to creative deity.

Do they use scientific fact, somehow?

Sifting the evidence for certainty?

No way. It's their denied religious vow:

They need some god for credibility.

An evil god, who sets calamity.

8/1/2018

A garden set in space. An awesome sight.

The plants and animals as complements,

And soaking in that mystic cosmic light.

Oh focus on those perfect testaments,

To set the scene for life's technology:

The ion channels for its signalling,

Thus paralleling our technology.

All underpinned by hi-tech programming.

Hot testaments? If that's with origins,

And it's a God we contemplate, then yes.

Real programming when any life begins,

And then the chance it could be limitless.

Maybe that's logical, all common sense.

No need for any sacred testaments.

8/1/2018

If it's the moral laws we contemplate,

Do they relate to cosmic particles?

Oh set a code beside a solid state,

To see how traits in those materials

Relate to any programming. Oh yes,

The clay is used with creativity,

And either feature could be limitless.

Yes, codes are perfect for a deity,

To shape humanity out of that clay,

With our ideas then, uncountable.

Oh yes, imagination sown in DNA,

Has Cosmos and all life as personal.

The steps, for physical to networking,

Need ingenuity and programming.

9/1/2018

How sure are we about the moral laws?

Are they a self-emergent property,

Or can we pose a self-sufficient cause,

Like sacred verse shows us with deity?

But for the fact police, the sacred verse

Is "Origin of Species", over time.

Yes, trivia, inside the Universe,

To give the rocks to people paradigm.

So,,, happiness is self-emergent, right?

And so the moral laws will be the same.

Just elements, no moral sense to cite,

No evil too, just molecules to blame.

The evolutionists won't be impressed.

No evil god out there to be addressed.

9/1/2018

What can we say about biology?

A world away from evolution spin,

A world away from instability,

But perfect for the Universe it's in.

A world away from wet geology,

Eternity away from randomness,

But perfect for the skills of deity.

Do we detect a pattern in all this?

That would be absolutely positive.

Micro machines, all based on DNA

In life. So we're not being negative,

And destiny can call, on any day.

Biology, no matter what the quirk:

Always a testament to handiwork.

10/1/2018

If morals die, are people brutalized,

If competition tells us how to act,

And self-control is never exercised?

A certain fact, like gravity's a fact.

And people seem to be exceptional.

All known when anybody meditates

While making anything industrial.

So does reality have moral traits,

Or just illusions, like for fact police?

Decision time. If only molecules,

Zero internal character like peace,

And definitely zero moral rules.

If morals die, we're lost humanity.

No matter what the traits of deity.

11/1/2018

If we reject that small internal voice,

Can we make judgements on reality?

No way, if it's just elemental choice

And we've ejected our humanity.

Oh yes, internal life to contemplate.

Is that the Universe to make it thus,

As elements and time negotiate,

Or blessings from a deity, for us?

With destiny, our choice sets us apart,

But check the veiled denied scenario:

The molecules have given us a start,

And myriad illusions let us know.

But choices can be made, on any day.

Ignore what evolutionists will say.

11/1/2018

Are thoughts just part of our biology,

Like evolution thought police insist?

Are they from quantum instability,

Then onto what the chemicals digest,

To give some meditation molecules?

What of the consequences of all that,

With no morality, no people rules?

If contemplating some internal chat,

It's only tricks of fate, cool chemistry.

Not anything to be concerned about,

Since there's no destiny, no deity.

To top that off, no scientific doubt.

But if we hunt eternal life out there,

Then we want our internal life aware.

12/1/2018

Oh check on that denied scenario,

For implications with our destiny.

No scientific fact unturned to show

Due diligence in our inquiry.

Is consciousness akin to flatulence,

Like fact police tell us, just physical?

Using the evolution inference,

So life and love are cosmological?

Do they stress no morality? No way.

Do fact police highlight any of that?

Another no. Rock soup for DNA,

For their mandated, no-god caveat.

But implications count with destiny,

If they belittle our humanity.

13/1/2018

What's scientific fact for anything?

Complexity, the more we focus in.

Increasing details on the detailing:

The opposite of evolution spin.

The opposite of plain heat energy,

Or gravity, or space, or nothingness.

We have a Cosmos of activity,

Epitomized by its connectedness

In subatomic laws, in particles,

In absolutely any place out there.

Oh entertain a place for miracles

To start all that, for any premiere.

The evolutionists bypass reality

To slur exceptional humanity.

13/1/2018

If evolutionists use tags, without

Defining them, prepare for trivia,

So there'll be zero scientific doubt.

Then oh, the insults on the courier,

Who points out any scientific fail,

Like wet evolving rocks for DNA.

Life's nuances will be of no avail.

It's their imaginary interplay,

Exclusively, to tether facts to spin.

Yes, fact police rely on fuzziness

To give the rocks to people origin:

Nothing, geology, then happiness.

It's rocks to DNA, or else, lookout:

Prepare to be insulted if we doubt.

14/1/2018

Our sciences don't deal with origins.

They study physical, the Universe,

So shouldn't be involved with aliens,

And shouldn't be so evidence averse.

Now meditate on our dichotomy:

A bottom-up or, top-down paradigm.

If there's clear signs of creativity,

Against a bottom-up, blind paradigm,

Would that be sciences in disrepair?

Oh yes, if no designer nuances.

Mandated randomness, that toxic air,

Has always suffocated sciences.

Oh check all spin with scientific fact,

And don't let evolutionists distract.

15/1/2018

If any life is sick, has it evolved,

Like evolution fact police insist?

Is there an evil deity involved

For anyone to be a realist?

If seeing life's calamity and pain,

Is it the elements for happiness?

For evolutionists, all fairly plain.

That view is absolutely obvious.

Calamity sets up their evidence

That wet geology made DNA.

Yes, fact police rely on elements

For only one creative interplay.

But realistic has the personal:

Innate humanity and technical.

15/1/2018

For life, what of the scientific way?

It must be nano-sized machinery

Set by the programming in DNA,

So something else, won't be reality.

It has to be the cool technologies,

The integrated systems, networking,

The hi-tech chemistry, the particles,

And engineering set in everything.

Are we exaggerating with all this?

No way. Oh take a scientific look.

All life: The scientific synthesis,

Confirmed by any scientific book.

Ah yes, if we zoom out, or focus in,

The opposite of evolution spin.

16/1/2018

Our overviews set our reality.

No doubt at all, details come later on.

So what about for our biology?

What overview is cool to focus on?

Should we be focusing on molecules,

Or all the hi-tech stuff, so obvious?

Maybe the particles, maybe the rules,

Maybe mundane, maybe ingenious,

Or maybe simple chemistry to start.

Yes, multiple view-points to focus in,

But oh, always,,, keep origins apart,

To separate the sciences from spin.

To study life, it should stay technical,

But overviews arise from personal.

16/1/2018

What layers sit above the networking,

To set life's inter and its intracellar?

Above the nuances of signalling,

Between connected systems media?

For internet technology, there's four,

Depending on the naming we employ.

For us, there's applications to explore,

For industry, or something we enjoy.

For life, all applications in all cells,

Can interact with their environment,

Either as individuals, or set of cells.

We can surmise a lone requirement:

A host of cool control systems inside.

Ultra-interconnectedness to guide.

17/1/2018

Is life a kludge from instability,

Or else ultra-interconnectedness

From planning by transcendent deity?

If put like that, big no to randomness.

So life,,, what of our overview again?

Just one, we want our destiny to call.

No kludge for us, no luck, no alien,

We want the inspiration to stand tall.

For us, nothing is by coincidence,

And everything exemplifies control.

We want our spirit to experience

The benefits of body, mind and soul.

Is that an inspirational world view?

Oh check on that practical overview.

17/1/2018

In life, why not just state the obvious?

Because the thought police scenario

Has just mandated out miraculous,

So no, no deity involved. But oh,

Check out a cool designer testament:

Bacteria have Wi-Fi signalling,

Or something near enough equivalent.

Besides all their internal networking,

Some chat, via clear media like glass.

Designer skills? Easy to recognise.

Cool tip for any normal science class?

No way, if wanting cells to self-arise.

But obvious suits skeptics perfectly.

Hi-tech for cells? Oh yes, from deity.

17/1/2018

The evolutionists use 'primitive'

Like it's a magic word. It is, for them,

The basic and essential spin to give

An 'ancient', blind design continuum.

But DNA hasn't evolved with time,

Since it began gazillion years ago.

For fact police, geology gave slime

Then DNA: The real magic scenario.

But DNA has always been hi-tech,

The epitome of what's reliable.

So yes, for us, each scientific speck

Always confirms all life is technical.

Can rocks be technical? All negative.

Oh check for spin in any primitive.

18/1/2018

What sets the nature of reality?

Technology, spun with life's DNA.

It's in the nature of humanity

Who implement the scientific way.

It's integrating evidence out there

For insights into any usefulness.

Yes, industry, so no, not unaware,

And not deluded on real happiness.

Yes, balancing of work and family,

The contemplation of a Universe,

Anticipation of our destiny,

And then reality of sacred verse.

Yes, meditate on destiny with us,

For open eyes, to sense ingenious.

18/1/2018

What sets the nature of biology,

With life embedded in our DNA?

No ifs, no buts, it's creativity,

To set off the designer interplay.

We have a complication in all that:

The evolutionists deny design,

Set by their scientific caveat:

We study how the elements align,

So everything is only elements,

Including thoughts for creativity.

Zero design, against the evidence,

For its mandated kludge biology.

In fact, it needs a string of caveats,

Set in agreements by compatriots.

18/1/2018

Step one: Biology to contemplate,

Incessant atheists to counteract,

But there's the logical to separate

Mandated spin from scientific fact.

Step two: The education fact police

Want in. No to creationists. To three:

The amateurs want in, so zero peace:

Yes, basics once again, repeatedly.

No, not an easy road to destiny,

If atheists have banned the obvious:

Real programming inside biology.

Then banned a deity to make it thus.

But confident denials in their spin

Tell us, they act the charlatan to win.

18/1/2018

If we laugh at their scientific base,

The fact police are always confident:

They wave a piece of paper in our face,

Or something near enough equivalent.

Yes, sciences show us that life arose

From elements. No details after that,

Since science deals in real scenarios.

Then also, if real evidence falls flat,

Computer simulations we can trust.

Then onto the essential back-up plan:

Compatriot agreements are a must.

Yes, confident, with that creation ban.

Their documents, instead of logical,

To ban our scientific miracle.

19/1/2018

Oh meditate, with overview in place:

A God who made a Universe for us,

Design, to set our scientific base,

Technology and then miraculous.

What now? Oh contemplate biology

To verify the skills beyond the veil.

Oh analyse the handiwork to see

True diligence involved, at any scale.

Our scientific base is,,, logic,,, right?

No other base can be foundational,

To let what was apart now reunite,

To reconfirm we're not delusional.

Biology: The high-tech testaments.

Oh let its DNA boost confidence.

20/1/2018

Oh travellers, if you have made a vow

To be as one, whatever may befall,

Start listening, no hesitating now,

With family, for destiny to call.

That would be listening to deity,

Acknowledging eternal sacred verse,

And redefining who is family.

That God, Creator of the Universe,

Made you, with endless possibilities.

So grasp his sacrificial death, his life

And love: What any true believer sees,

To wait on destiny as man and wife.

A complicated God to recognise,

Then destiny? Chin up, let hope arise.

21/1/2018

All miracles are false, a modern fact:

Mandated out by scientific law.

In life, we need our overviews intact,

So no, no God to make a dinosaur,

No God for DNA, for programming,

And no to any consciousness in us.

For all its talk on what's inspiring,

And of that mystical connectedness,

Our sciences don't offer destiny.

Yes, zero hope, incessant struggling,

And then, always belittling humanity.

The opposite of what's inspiring.

If fact police tweak scientific law,

It's never open options to explore.

22/1/2018

The origins debate appears to be

The truth against religious articles.

The target being Christianity.

No place for destiny, no miracles,

No place for God in any sciences,

So no to contemplating qualities:

Set rules for scientific challenges,

Or,,, openness to possibilities.

But fact police will all be horrified:

No way is that a picture of reality.

But in their articles: Design denied,

So rocks evolved into technology.

Coincidence, with fancy molecules,

Has given scientific sacred rules.

23/1/2018

If we check out the origins debate,

Outrageous science is the status quo.

Yes, only elements to contemplate,

To set the blind design scenario:

Wet rocks for some amoeba variant,

Onto the bugs for dinosaurs? Absurd.

We have the fish becoming ambulant,

And scales evolving feathers of a bird.

Inane, but all the thought police insist

There are no other real alternatives.

Ah yes, the bugs to make a scientist,

So accidents for anything that lives.

That's evolution theory one-o-one.

And for the skeptical, a world of fun.

24/1/2018

What's evolution theory one-o-one?

Bugs,,, with perfect evolvability.

The DNA for each mammalian,

Like protein translation machinery,

With all those nuances for RNA.

A complicated spliceosome to knit,

To snip, to send new isoforms away,

With multiple sensors controlling it?

Can that scenario make any sense?

Oh yes, but only for the optimists,

In evolution thought experiments,

Having excluded the creationists.

Oh yes, machinery in superbugs,

Gave us a deep propensity for hugs.

26/1/2018

Oh meditate on cellular with us.

Ions in channelling, to organelles,

To cytoplasm and the nucleus,

Appreciating mysteries in cells.

Yes, issues evolutionists ignore:

Transducers or associated parts,

Whether a single cell or dinosaur.

Insights only technology imparts,

Ah la, instrumentation one-o-one.

Oh check the automatic signalling,

Control or each incorporated run,

And all its integrated processing.

Yes, cellular is high technology.

Oh pause to analyse its mystery.

27/1/2018

Is evolution change for thought police?

Yes, scientific fact, akin to gravity.

But can it make a techno masterpiece?

Another yes, their scientific certainty.

For fact police, creationists believe

God made all species like we see today.

That's obviously wrong, so we receive

Our life, since rocks evolved our DNA.

Their spin is always wrong, lucky for us,

And we're awake to their dichotomy.

Yes, their religious spin is obvious:

All species change, so there's no deity.

Yes, fact police have set the overviews.

No need to follow scientific clues.

28/1/2018

The numero uno dichotomy?

A God or not to set our origins.

And if we heed the call of destiny,

Maybe a God against the aliens.

So any view, a God against the rest.

The real experiments, to let us see,

Remembering our scientific quest

To find the nature of reality.

Then introspection as the vital link,

So honesty would be of benefit.

A God who gave abilities to think,

Or else, some version of inanimate.

Yes, our dichotomy is always there.

For destiny, the dross or silverware.

30/1/2018

Knowing the evolution interplay

As it controls the reigning paradigm,

We ask, what sets the scientific way?

Whatever view, it's relative to time.

The way to link to real experiments

Inside a real spacetime continuum,

And from repeated real experience.

So can deep space evolve Uranium,

That's now embedded in geology?

For evolutionists, their only way,

So always story time with history.

But we crave for the realistic way.

Yes, injury is likely in our quest,

But we hold to each scientific test.

31/1/2018